Free Trial Corporate Access

Global Investor Magazine
Global Investor Magazine Copying and distributing are prohibited without permission of the publisher
Email a friend
  • Please enter a maximum of 5 recipients. Use ; to separate more than one email address.

Industry remains unprepared for SFTR

13 December 2016

Leading figures discussed the compliance challenge posed by the major EU regulation ahead of its 2018 implementation, at an event hosted by EquiLend

The introduction of Securities Financing Transaction Regulation (SFTR) in 2018 will be one of the biggest ever fundamental changes to the SFT industry, delegates heard at an EquiLend-hosted event yesterday. However, the industry is only partially prepared to provide the required data to trade repositories (TRs) by the 2018 implementation date.

The aim of SFTR, as with EMIR reporting, is to provide regulators with sufficiently high quality data to successfully identify the build-up of systemic risk. Some in the industry have criticised its approach as heavy-handed and it certainly creates a huge compliance challenge.

The second round of ESMA’s consultation closed on 30 November and it is expected that its final draft technical standards will be submitted to the European Commission in January 2017 before being finalised. 

Once finalised, firms will have 12 months to comply, starting quarterly by banks and investment firms, followed by CCPs and CSDs, financial counterparties and then corporates. Therefore, the effective dates are unknown but expected to start in Q1 2018.

The panel was unanimous in expecting little or no change from the second draft text. "That has been pretty clear throughout this process. ESMA has listened and made changes where it felt they needed to be," said Laurence Marshall, COO, EquiLend.

A poll of delegates asked how prepared their organisation was for SFTR: it found that 47% thought that more analysis was required, 45% understood the requirements but were still looking for a solution, and all of the remaining 8% was not prepared. After the event, several people confided they thought this was overly optimistic.

"The big challenge for firms is to look at how they process their business today and consider whether they can get to the required reporting through that model – I think the answer is 'no’," said Marshall. "There are going to have to be fundamental changes."

The reluctance of firms to invest in a reporting solution is at least in part due to confusion about where responsibility lies. 

"I do not think people are particularly clear as to the way the SFTR regulations will be finalised," said Nick Nicholls, lead consultant, GFT UK. "There is a lot of concern about how they are going to meet those regulations. A number of clients are looking to see how work that they have done for EMIR and MIFID II might help them. There are a lot of unanswered questions that we hope to see clarified."

Agent lenders are usually on hand to help beneficial owners achieve regulatory compliance and anecdotal evidence suggests they expect this to be the case for SFTR, despite the obligations being on the principles to those transactions.

James Day, managing director & business executive for securities finance in EMEA, BNY Mellon Markets, said: "Most clients we are talking to are looking to the agent lender to solve the problem. It they have to build their own solution, I think many will question the benefit of lending and this could impact market liquidity. The agent lender therefore needs to evaluate the business case and associated risks of being part of the solution set and price it accordingly."

Single Page 1 | 2

Have your say
  • All comments are subject to editorial review.
    All fields are compulsory.