The blockchain paradox - opinion

The blockchain paradox - opinion

In one of his famous paradoxes, the ancient Greek philosopher Zeno tells us how Achilles decides to race a tortoise but allows it a head start. When the race begins, Achilles runs to where the tortoise started but finds it has already moved. He then runs to the point where the tortoise moved to, only to again find it slightly ahead. This cycle continues until Achilles finally gives up exhausted, unable to ever overtake.

Current blockchain solutions in the financial services industry have their own logical paradoxes to overcome. A blockchain ledger needs a validation mechanism, yet this introduces capacity constraints and latency, which, like Achilles, means it can never catch up with real-time processing.

While Bitcoin, the original use of blockchain, dealt with simple transfers of ledger-referenced value, Wall Street’s full set of interdependent products and lifecycles represent an Olympic pantheon of events.

Additionally, current blockchain solutions require an ever-expanding continuous record in order to access any prior transactions and balances, which ultimately generates a storage requirement that is not viable. Not only has the blockchain to catch up; it also faces a continuously moving target. This problem has no – at least publicised – solution and often is described conferences as “being worked on”.

Consensus algorithms

In order to increase the speed of processing and validation in the ubiquitous consensus algorithm, the industry is looking at various innovative ideas that include sharded consensus (a divide-and-conquer mechanism to create a quicker, fragmented, trusted-node consensus) and lightning networks (where transactions are agreed outside the main blockchain and then recorded in it later). While there are benefits of these solutions they cannot support the real-time transactions that are critical for market-making or algorithmic trading and execution.

No use cases yet exist for truly complex transactions. While there are current use cases involving repo, syndicated loans, credit default and interest rate swaps that may be complex in terms of structure, valuation and monitoring, they are all over-the-counter (OTC) transactions. Such OTC transactions are based on low-volume, unregistered securities where settlement is predominantly for payment streams. These merely represent customised versions of the simplest use cases.

In addition to the speed, capacity and scalability challenges, there are also complex market interdependencies to consider. Consider a fund manager selling a bond when that bond had already been put out on loan by the custodian, the borrowing broker had passed it on to a hedge fund, the hedge fund sold it short, and the buyer from the hedge fund is a money market fund. There is no easy way to represent that complex interdependent settlement lifecycle in a ledger-referenced system.

Rather than iteratively enhancing initial, basic blockchains, a blockchain solution designer has to address the challenges that are required to support the whole financial services industry. If a blockchain solution cannot address all of these challenges, it will have limited use and benefit to the industry. These include:

·         A flexible means to code and control multiple lifecycles

·         Ledger processing and validation that allows for scalability and real-time capacity

·         Confidentiality of shared records

·         Dual, bi-directional asset settlement as with FX or DVP/RVP

·       ·         Financing and liability-driven transactions

·         ·         Short, payable and unbacked future-dated transactions

·        ·         The ability to interact with current markets or other blockchain networks

·         ·         A simple means to allow for all the downstream monitoring, analysis and reporting required of the industry

It is never the case for technologically-driven processes that the solution is first built and then scalability, flexibility, sustainability and reliability are added afterwards; they have to be intrinsic to the design.

The solution to Zeno’s paradox was provided by Sir Isaac Newton using ingenious and fundamentally-derived differential calculus. New, fundamentally-derived blockchain designs have been defined as those that can overcome these challenges and have the potential to succeed and be adopted universally. This is possible – the apparently unresolvable blockchain paradoxes are only within the current blockchain solutions and not the principles upon which blockchains are based.

Paul Dowding is the managing director, blockchain solutions lead, of the financial services strategy and solutions practice of Gartland and Mellina Group (GMG). GMG has filed a provisional patent application to develop unique, holistic, blockchain solutions for the financial services industry, which are product, transaction and functionally agnostic and collectively represent a Blockchain utility.




Most Popular

Thought Leaders

Pirum in the Americas: An evolving company in complex times

Nancy Steiker, head of business development, Americas, Pirum

Challenges to the sec finance status quo

Natixis’ Anthony Caserta and Saverio Costa outline the opportunities and...

EquiLend Spire: Untangling the sec finance spider web

EquiLend’s Paul Lynch and Dan Dougherty and Stonewain’s Armeet Sandhu spoke to...

Centralized collateral management becoming a reality

Bimal Kadikar, CEO of Transcend Street Solutions

The evolution of network management

Massimiliano Notarianni, Global Head of Network Management at Societe Generale